I don’t think anyone could argue that SAS and SATA aren’t local, but does local apply to Thunderbolt, eSATA, USB, Firewire? If so, what about USB 2.0 versus 3.0? What determines calling something network storage? The presense of TCP/IP or maybe Ethernet? Is iSCSI over gigabit Ethernet considered network and bad? What about iSCSI over 10 gigabit? Of course there are the different versions of SMB as well. The struggle with implementing a local-disk-is-best policy in the enterprise is defining what exactly local means. Is there a good, singular source for file geodatabase best practices or is it a best practice here and another one over there? The GIS System Design Strategies Wiki has best practices scattered throughout it, but it wasn't until the 34th edition in the spring of 2014 that file geodatabases were included in certain sections of the Network Communications chapter. Although I have experienced firsthand the performance and stability challenges of exposing file geodatabases over networking protocols, I am trying to recall whether I have seen it documented as being against best practice. Ensure the client machine can communicate to the server.There is something straightforward and likeable about "local disk is best," but the situation isn't quite as simple when we move into the realm of best practices and enterprise GIS.Ensure the SMB share is configured correctly on the server.We are able to map our SMB share, and have the correct access given our share configuration.Here we can see our SMB share is connected, and we can create a folder. Use smbup to connect to windows shares plus#We can also select the plus at the bottom to save this information if we need to reconnect.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |